Why I'm Not Excited About the Graphene OS and Motorola Partnership

(podcast.switchedtolinux.com)

16 points | by summm 53 minutes ago

4 comments

  • gruez 19 minutes ago
    Youtube page, which has auto-generated transcripts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLEkUGuw374

    tl;dw:

    1. it's expensive

    2. requires online connection and account to unlock bootloader

    3. lenovo (the parent company) had shady behavior in the past

    • LikelySupernova 10 minutes ago
      Then buy Pixel A series, it has none of those cons. And I'd say at that price point, Tensor isn't even a bad processor.
    • bushwart 9 minutes ago
      Needing an account to unlock the bootloader is a real bummer. I can live with issues 1 and 3. Thanks for the notes.
  • Hobadee 4 minutes ago
    Last time a custom Android distro (CyanogenMod) made a deal with a manufacturer, everything went belly-up. I have little faith that the same won't happen again. :-(
  • BearOso 15 minutes ago
    Summary:

    - The Motorola flagship costs too much and he's worried it will no longer run on the Pixel 7a that he got for $200 or that there will be any cheap options.

    But they said already there would be cheap options, and Motorola has a Moto G series that it would likely use.

    - Worried about other stuff that existing Motorola Android phones do, like privacy violations.

    ...that definitely won't be in GrapheneOS, they wouldn't allow it.

    - More things Motorola does as a company that are bad.

    The current option being Google means, despite that, Motorola is probably better.

  • aniviacat 9 minutes ago
    tl;dr:

    - GrapheneOS is only supported on Motorola's flagship devices, which the author deems too expensive

    - Motorola historically has made unlocking the bootloader difficult, and GrapheneOS has not yet confirmed that this will become easier.

    - The author does not trust Motorola.