The Helicopter with Radioactive Blades

(hackaday.com)

41 points | by zdw 23 hours ago

4 comments

  • 46Bit 26 minutes ago
    The article is very vague on how the radioactivity allows detection of leaking gas.

    The video at the bottom explains from 7:50 in. Gas pressure pressing on a spring holds a radiation shield in place. If the gas leaks the shield moves and the radiation can be detected.

    • tomasphan 1 minute ago
      The titanium spar is filled with gas. If there was a crack in the spar the gas would escape, therefore tripping the pressure sensitive radiation shield. Releasing radiation that can be detected inside the helicopter.

      Wireless systems aren’t used for opsec reasons.

  • patwolf 10 minutes ago
    Often in software development I encounter code that seems overly complex. It's not always obvious at first glance whether that complexity is because it's solving a really difficult problem, or because the developers made it more complex than it needed to be.

    Having no domain knowledge of the problems of detecting cracks in blades, this sounds like either a genius solution to a super hard problem, or unnecessary complexity.

  • vova_hn2 12 minutes ago
    What if the helicopter would have to operate in a contaminated area? Wouldn't it cause false positives?

    > The CH-53 Sea Stallion first entered service in 1966

    1966 is Cold War era, so, I think, an idea that a military helicopter would have to fly in an area that has been recently nuked wasn't totally inconceivable...

    • stackghost 5 minutes ago
      Exposure to a nuclear blast doesn't necessarily make things radioactive. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not radioactive wastelands. Even in Chernobyl, the other reactors continued to operate for a time after the accident, and nature is thriving.

      But, the radiation detector is on the upper surface of the tail. Hypothetical Beta particles from the ground will strike the underside of the tail and not the detector.

      • xattt 0 minutes ago
        [delayed]
  • fluorinerocket 10 minutes ago
    Terrible explanation