3 comments

  • tekacs 18 minutes ago
    For anyone who – like me – was hoping for a video to see what it looks like:

    https://youtu.be/h2V8YyfKCVs?t=4421

  • JaRail 37 minutes ago
    Cool technique!
  • PcChip 2 hours ago
    what is it about raytraced animation that makes it more expensive to update the BVH mesh vertices every frame, compared to old-school bone animation where you send the info to the vertex shader every frame?
    • modeless 1 hour ago
      Massively simplifying here but when doing one rasterization pass you process a flat list of triangles, in order, once. When raytracing a camera view you query a database of triangles, at least once for each pixel. To avoid scanning the whole list of triangles for every pixel, the database needs a fancy 3D spatial index whose structure depends on the exact position of each vertex. When you modify the position of vertices you have to fix up or rebuild the fancy spatial index too.
    • juancn 1 hour ago
      To make ray tracing practical, you need to update the ray-tracing accelerating structures when you animate.
    • Keyframe 26 minutes ago
      it's a global visibility problem, unlike rasterization which is a mostly localized problem.

      apart from all the updates and acceleration structures you have to do, you are also battling cache coherency during ray traversal, or as the saying goes: Primary rays cache, secondary trash.