Starship V3

(spacex.com)

101 points | by fprog 1 hour ago

13 comments

  • gok 4 minutes ago
    [delayed]
  • beambot 2 minutes ago
    Those Raptor 3 engines are a thing of beautiful simplicity compared to their forebears...
  • hparadiz 49 minutes ago
    Close ups of the tail fins and the hull exterior have little hex tiles covering the entire tail fin assembly. There's also different sizes of tile. Exciting to see if that will be enough structural reinforcement.
    • randallsquared 42 minutes ago
      Yeah, the tile complexity is worrying. I hope they're able to simplify that or fully streamline the manufacturing and attachment. From the outside, the tiles seem like a Shuttle re-run, and refurbishment of those was one of the long poles in reuse.
  • a34729t 22 minutes ago
    The new more powerful engines with built in heat shield are a phenomenal achievement. Hopefully they perform as good as they look!
  • dmix 1 hour ago
    One more week

    > Liftoff will occur at 6:30 p.m. ET on Monday (May 19)

    https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/...

    • laweijfmvo 1 hour ago
      isn’t Monday the 18th?
      • tristanj 1 hour ago
        Yes, the linked space.com article has an error. The launch is happening Tuesday the 19th.
        • mcbits 1 hour ago
          I prefer to call it an unplanned calendar learning opportunity.
  • phren0logy 10 minutes ago
    I was disappointed when this was not the command line prompt library
  • kyriakos 52 minutes ago
    Page banned in my country apparently
  • danpalmer 16 minutes ago
    I used to follow Starship so intently, similarly NASA things, but Musk's antics, politicising of everything he touches, the increasing use of NASA as US propaganda, has all really put me off it. It's hard to get excited about these things anymore, which is sad because they're otherwise legitimately exciting.
    • gpt5 7 minutes ago
      Why is everything today has to be "good" or "bad". Where is the nuance? Where is seeing things as they are - an exciting endeavor built by thousands of people, one of them has flaws you don't like.

      The rise of moralization of everything is really killing online discourse. It's gotten to the point where people will now mostly criticize and support ideas based on who proposed them, and not based on their merits. Tribalism at its worst.

      • qsera 1 minute ago
        >people will now mostly criticize and support ideas based on who proposed them, and not based on their merits.

        "People" were always like that and will be so..stupid. Let me quote Agent K from MIB for you.

        > A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it...

    • GroksBarnacles 12 minutes ago
      I'm with you. Everything government that at least still pretended to serve the public interested and greater good has been openly captured by individuals and movements concerned with some more selfish agenda.
    • bigyabai 5 minutes ago
      > the increasing use of NASA as US propaganda

      NASA has been propaganda since Operation Paperclip, sadly. It's hard to politicize something that's always been political, even if Musk gives Peenemünde optics a run for it's money.

    • narrator 13 minutes ago
      Meanwhile, what have you done to help humanity get to space lately? Oh right, nothing.
      • emkoemko 3 minutes ago
        umm we all helped? its called taxes... how do you think Starship is being funded ?
        • eagerpace 0 minutes ago
          By an already super profitable SapceX. The moon stuff is a drop in the bucket and only came well after success.

          What other company would you rather see funding go to?

  • moralestapia 51 minutes ago
    Yay, go Elon!

    What SpaceX has accomplished is just phenomenal.

  • vzaliva 45 minutes ago
    Reading reports of people objecting datacenters build in their states I wonder how Florida residents feel about the Spaceport ? It will certainly be more distruptive than datacenters.
    • vjvjvjvjghv 8 minutes ago
      [delayed]
    • nik282000 37 minutes ago
      There's only one Spaceport.
      • gpm 24 minutes ago
        SpaceX has openly advertised their intent to turn starship into a faster long distance travel alternative to airplanes. Their intent, should all go well, is to have many, many, spaceports.

        For their conventional space launch operations they also want multiple... to target different orbits, and to parallelize the high volume operations they anticipate.

        There's already two Starship launch sites. The one in use in Texas, and one (LC-39A) in development at Kennedy Space Center, Florida. And there's good reason to believe they've begun planning a third in Louisiana. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=64900.0

    • jdw64 27 minutes ago
      [dead]
    • tristanj 36 minutes ago
      A spaceport will probably use less water /s

      On a more serious note, the Cape Canaveral area / Kennedy Space Center has a large amount of empty land to build space infrastructure. The island has been dedicated to space facilities since the 1960s. Both SpaceX and Blue Origin have facilities there.

  • slac 16 minutes ago
    Gotta pump that Grok IPO /s Seriously though, the whole SpaceXAI makes zero sense to me. SpaceX was a wonderful company and there was zero need to pollute it with Twitter and a service that creates sexual images of people without their consent.