5 comments

  • fy20 5 minutes ago
    How much more is the BOM for a silent fan like in Noctua? I recently bought a controller for my well water pump, and it has two 80mm fans for cooling. Sounds like an aircraft when taking off and doesn't seem to move much air. I'm planning to replace them with Noctua fans.
  • egeozcan 1 hour ago
    > To protect our intellectual property, certain features – such as fan impeller geometries – have been slightly modified while remaining visually very close to the actual product.

    Noob question: If someone wants to copy their design with no respect to their intellectual property, can't they just 3D scan?

    • userbinator 34 minutes ago
      Unless they still have an unexpired patent on the design, it's completely legal to clone. Physical objects simply do not have the same type of copyright protection, and there is considerable precedent in making compatible components --- the most notable example being the automotive aftermarket.
    • fecal_henge 1 hour ago
      I would think so, or by taking cross sections. Its hard to believe they have some miraculous geometry that needs guarding anyway. Maybe they are trying to dissuade people who might try to 3d print an impeller.

      3d models for industrial fan manufacturers (Sanyo,NMB) are widely available.

      • quanto 1 hour ago
        There could be geometrically tiny optimizations that lead to an outsized impact in noise and flow by turbulence reduction. While optimizing an impeller with computational FSI (fluid structure interaction) is not as hard as before, it still is not trivial. And it's these (perhaps small) optimizations that justify Noctua being 5x more expensive than generic black fan.
        • fyrn_ 50 minutes ago
          I believe the tolerances to the fan housing (which reduces turbulence and thus noise), and the the material stiffness needed for that small tolerance, are the alleged reason there are few copycats. Supposedly getting plastic that rigid is hard. I've tried to find hard numbers and validate that claim, but I wasn't able to. Would probably have to measure an actual noctua fan blade to know. On the other hand, metal printing is attainable now..
    • whazor 19 minutes ago
      Wouldn't there be too much error when you both 3D scan and 3D print it?
    • zbrozek 1 hour ago
      Yes, though the fidelity offered by faithful CAD would be both easier to interpret correctly and might even hint at the CAD feature tree.

      Kudos to them for releasing models useful for integration.

      • egeozcan 1 hour ago
        Yes, by no means did I comment to take away from the great service they are doing to the builders. I'm a Noctua fan!

        I was just curious.

        • dcminter 37 minutes ago
          > I'm a Noctua fan!

          :)

  • jasiek 30 minutes ago
    Mikrotik does this for some of their parts as well
    • kernalix7 12 minutes ago
      Good to know, didn't realize Mikrotik did this too. Useful for homelab planning where rack space and airflow actually matter.
  • kernalix7 43 minutes ago
    Would have saved me time on a 3D printer I designed a while back. I integrated Noctua fans and ended up measuring mounting dimensions by hand. Having the official CAD models would have made fan integration a lot cleaner.
    • userbinator 31 minutes ago
      Aren't their dimensions standard? Many people replace other fans with Noctua's, after all.
      • kernalix7 19 minutes ago
        The fan body itself follows standard 120/140mm dimensions, but I needed the smaller details for my design, the rubber dampers, anti-vibration corners, cable routing clips. Those don't show up cleanly in the datasheet, so I ended up using a caliper. That's the part the official CAD would have helped most with.
  • embedding-shape 2 days ago