Bodega Cats of New York

(bodegacatsofnewyork.com)

80 points | by zdw 4 days ago

5 comments

  • WetBurritoLuv 58 minutes ago
    I read Shop Cats of New York a few years ago, and it was great

    https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/shop-cats-of-new-york-tamar...

  • jackconsidine 1 hour ago
    Was so excited when I saw this link. Was hoping it would be more like the Trees of New York [0], but appears to be a book.

    The bodega in my last neighborhood (Fort Greene) featured an orange cat, Ice Spice. Spice birthed Olivia who now has loads of kittens. They wander in and own like they own the place, even whining at customers to open the doors for them. Here's a picture I took of Olivia on top of the tobacco products

    [0] https://tree-map.nycgovparks.org/tree-map/neighborhood/177

    [1] https://ibb.co/h1cJTs0g

    • jjtheblunt 1 hour ago
      That sounds profoundly irresponsible of the associated humans.
      • jkestner 1 hour ago
        True. It's unconscionable to give a cat access to cigarettes.
      • rafram 35 minutes ago
        Lots of bodega cats are allowed to go out on the street. They usually don't wander far. Cats know where home is.
      • crooked-v 19 minutes ago
        It would be irresponsible for a pet owner... but you have to understand the context is New York rats, which exist in immense numbers, massively beyond every other major US city, because of a century of just leaving trash piled up on the sidewalk (https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-11-27/new-yo...).

        Bodega cats aren't pets, they're a cheap and low-impact way to keep rats from moving into the bodega en masse. If one gets run over by a car, that's just an unfortunate cost of business for a bodega owner who needs an option that works better than putting glue traps every five feet or fumigating the entire place every week.

  • chirau 2 hours ago
    When i first realized that their primary purpose was to get rid of rats, I had quite the chuckle.
    • nonethewiser 2 hours ago
      Yeah this is why I dont find it endearing. It's just pointing to unsanitary conditions. It's ubiquitous in NYC which may have dulled some senses but it's not ubiquitous everywhere.

      Cat's themselves are not very sanitary. Better than rats, sure, but they are a source of toxoplasmosis which is very dangerous to pregnant women for example. Limiting exposure is manageable when keeping as a pet, but its a terrible baseline for a cramped public store.

      • bombcar 2 hours ago
        The vast majority of NYCs problem can be tied to their trash debacle, which is so outlandish it's hard for anyone not from there to believe is a real thing in 2206.

        It appears they finally discovered dumpsters recently: https://www.amny.com/news/curbside-empire-trash-bins-coming-...

        (Another crazy trash city was (is?) Seattle with their weird judgement causing everyone to compact their trash.)

        • yardie 1 minute ago
          The reasoning gets worse the further you peel back that onion. Basically dumpsters are too large for sidewalks. Logically, it would make sense to put them on the curb. But no, drivers would complain because having to give up any curbside parking whatsoever.
        • blatherard 1 hour ago
          And the difficulties of trash handling are further traceable, at least in Manhattan, to the decision by city planners in 1811 to not build alleys. No obvious place to store trash, nor an obvious place to put it when being collected.

          If you drive in Manhattan you'll also notice a whole lot of delivery trucks and other vehicles blocking lanes, and a lot of designated delivery-only parking zones. This is rooted in the same lack of alleys.

        • RandallBrown 2 hours ago
          What about Seattle's trash was crazy? I've lived here for 14 years and never noticed anything weird about it compared to other places I've lived.
          • buildsjets 1 hour ago
            He's being overly dramatic, and it's not a "Judgment", it's simple economics. Seattle is basically out of landfill space, the Cedar Hills landfill is a 96.6% capacity, so all trash needs to be trucked out of state. To minimize the cost of doing that they encourage sending most of your waste stream to recycling or compost instead. Many of the local trash haul haulers provide nice large recycle and compost bins, but a tiny landfill waste container unless you pay extra, hence the necessary compacting and stomping. My hauler charges an extra $25 fee if the flip-down lid on the garbage container is not fully closed, and they send you a photo and video of your non-compliant container along with the bill.

            Again, this is not a judgement or a mandate. You can pay for a larger garbage can or for a multiple garbage cans if you want to. But you have to pay for how your consumption habits impact the cost of disposal.

          • bombcar 1 hour ago
            IIRC they got a judgement against them a long time ago and charged more per can to pay for it - but my memory may be off. All I know is all the older homes have trash compactors and there was something called the "Seattle Stomp" and it wasn't a dance. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1995/jan/26/seattle-stomp-...
            • buildsjets 42 minutes ago
              You do not recall correctly. That's not an article about Seattle. It's an article about Spokane, which is little college town close to five hours away from Seattle. There was no legal judgement, and there was no municipal government action here. A private corporation raised their prices, and their customers reacted by trying to get more for their money. John Smith's invisible hand continues to sculpt our reality.
        • addaon 2 hours ago
          > 2206

          Let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

          [Posted from 2026.]

        • pcrh 2 hours ago
          It's still a problem in 2206?
        • dirck-norman 1 hour ago
          NYC was built without alleyways and much of NYC is single vaulted sewer systems due to its age. There is no space to put underground trash bins.

          NYC is also non-uniform, so there are different types of trucks and streets.

          Adam's admin largely solved this during his term, but the above ground bins are unpopular because they're ugly and then it takes time to retrofit the garbage trucks for mechanical pickup.

          https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/02/upshot/nyc-tr...

      • alexjplant 1 hour ago
        > they are a source of toxoplasmosis

        You are far more likely to get it from undercooked beef or shellfish than from a cat. Less than 1% of cats broadly are shedding it at any given time and that number is even lower for indoor cats. If, like me, you have a penchant for rare steak and beef tartare then there's a decent chance that you have it.

      • jjtheblunt 1 hour ago
        > Cat's themselves are not very sanitary. Better than rats, sure, but they are a source of toxoplasmosis

        Hyperbole and toxoplasmosis go well together.

        In particular: it's a limited time window when an infected feline could transmit toxoplasmosis. It can be dangerous to pregnancies, or immuno-compromised individuals.

        Most humans (and other beings) aren't pregnant or immunocompromised, but the drama of the topic gets clicks, so it's a meme of sorts, and it resurfaces every six months or so in the news as if a revelation.

        • kirubakaran 51 minutes ago
          > Most humans (and other beings) aren't pregnant or immunocompromised

          Just because pregnant and immuno-compromised people are in the minority, it's not a big deal?

          • sporadicism 41 minutes ago
            Additionally, I can't imagine being blase about gaining parasites just because you're not pregnant or immunocompromised.
            • jjtheblunt 38 minutes ago
              no one is being blase : we're immersed in a biological world teeming with such critters...and we exist through evolutionary adaptation to such. for fun, check out mites around eyelashes, for an innocuous example.
          • jjtheblunt 36 minutes ago
            it's a big deal for some, but not for all individuals, is the point clearly made.
            • kirubakaran 34 minutes ago
              Well you wrote "Hyperbole and toxoplasmosis go well together". It's not "hyperbole" to care about others, however few they are, even though you yourself might not be at risk, right?

              But I don't mean to be confrontational. I understand that it is probably annoying to hear toxoplasmosis talked about like it is black death.

      • vedaba 1 hour ago
        You just angered a lot of cat people
        • delecti 1 hour ago
          In my experience most people lovingly refer to their cats in negative-sounding ways. One of the terms of endearment we used for our most recent cat was "stinky little piss baby". I think most cat owners are well aware that they're unsanitary creatures.
          • Jtsummers 1 hour ago
            If your housecat stinks, it's likely unhealthy or you're not providing it with a clean litterbox or you have insufficient litterboxes for the number of cats you have.
            • bluefirebrand 42 minutes ago
              Calling your cat stinky does not actually mean they smell bad
          • jjtheblunt 1 hour ago
            dog person here : they're unsanitary how? they constantly fastidously clean themselves, from what i see. dogs roll in rotting anything for sport.
            • delusional 9 minutes ago
              I suppose they're unsanitary in the same way all animals that aren't humans are: They don't was their hands? Cats don't strike me a particularly dirty creatures. They're not exactly clean and well groomed from nature, but no animal really is.
    • sdrm 2 hours ago
      Paris should take notes
  • cgg1 1 hour ago
    Can’t wait for the sequel:

    Bodega Rats of New York

  • noplace1ikegone 1 hour ago
    You can’t have a great product without proper security.