6 comments

  • allenu 1 hour ago
    I like the clean design of the landing page. I downloaded it and started the app and it needs an OBJ file to even do anything, so I wasn't able to play with it at all.

    It would be cool if it included sample OBJ files to entice me to find my own later. Otherwise I feel like I just hit a wall immediately in the app will probably not try it again.

    • 1-more 57 minutes ago
      The way I tested was search Thingiverse for "angular" and download an STL, then convert it online to an OBJ on the first search result for "stl to obj"

      Specifically I tried this rook from this chess set. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5994219/files

      Sadly, some of the crenelations on top of it are just cubes with 2 sides missing that would be impossible to attach to the folded up rook. I imagine there is a ton of loss between a file for a 3D printer, a random convert to Obj with no settings, and this net maker, so I'm not unsympathetic to the problem. It's just that this is a printout that would not be foldable into something useful.

  • dnpls 2 hours ago
    • aziaziazi 19 minutes ago
      But for Mac! I fonder the difference of the free and paid version through.
    • detritus 1 hour ago
      So weird for me to see this popup now on HN as I happened to dig through an old downloads folder a few minutes ago and saw an install file for Pepakura (13/11/2014), and wondered where that sort of thing had ended up... .
    • moralestapia 1 hour ago
      No!

      This one is called Unfolder, it's a different app, made by a different person, etc...

      More than one app per category can exist, and that's good!

  • KaiserPro 25 minutes ago
    Oooo this might be useful for doing geometry unwrapping for laser cutting
  • Aurornis 34 minutes ago
    This is really cool.

    As someone who is not into papercraft I'm intrigued, but it feels like it's not for me. If the app was advertised as having a small selection of simple models to get started with, people in my position might be more interested in trying it out.

  • constantlm 1 hour ago
    This is great - reminds me of the golden age of cool little MacOS apps
  • ElijahLynn 2 hours ago
    Mac only. Is there any reason this couldn't be a web app? And seems pretty restrictive to just have one platform, a desktop Mac.
    • dwb 1 hour ago
      If I built a Mac app, the reason would be that I use a Mac, as do a lot of other people, and native apps are a lot more pleasant than non-native apps. I don't really understand why it's "restrictive"? There is no restriction happening.
    • hbn 1 hour ago
      The author had to decide between making something excellent for some people or mediocre for everyone, and chose the former
    • aziaziazi 17 minutes ago
      You may use Pepakura if you’re running windows. Not sure if a web or linux alternative exist.
    • joemi 1 hour ago
      The same could be said about pretty much _any_ software.