"email us for a chance to win a free trip to Switzerland"
A chance to win is not enough motivation for me to actually write the email. I would assume it was simply an opportunity to collect email addresses, so I (personally) am not to likely to email them even if I did fully read their privacy policy.
The implication here is kind of funny in that even if you do write legal stuff in language that your customers can understand, most of them still won't read it. And to be fair, I'm guilty of this more often than not.
Smart PR move and motivation to read more privacy policies.
Looks like they only offer one plan, $99/month, which is pretty steep but must offset what other carriers make selling customer info. That's about double what I'm paying now but I do like the idea.
Some put off using the service and look for alternatives for as long as possible (often ever) if they're presented with tomes of legal documents to accept
A chance to win is not enough motivation for me to actually write the email. I would assume it was simply an opportunity to collect email addresses, so I (personally) am not to likely to email them even if I did fully read their privacy policy.
"No, it is an exceptional publicity stunt."
Cell service for the fairly paranoid (33 days ago, 191 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47144325
Was that "you didn't put that in your privacy policy" or "your policy is illegal"?
Looks like they only offer one plan, $99/month, which is pretty steep but must offset what other carriers make selling customer info. That's about double what I'm paying now but I do like the idea.
Some put off using the service and look for alternatives for as long as possible (often ever) if they're presented with tomes of legal documents to accept