6 comments

  • Reubachi 1 hour ago
    "Mr. Foreman was not at home during the 2002 police raid, but a security camera system and his wife, using her cellphone, recorded the “faces and bodies” of the officers while they were on the property, according to the lawsuit"

    "2002" New York Times, everyone.

    Props to afroman for his perfect demeanor/attitude during all this.

    • esprehn 1 hour ago
      2022. I'm not sure phones recorded useful video in 2002.
      • refulgentis 51 minutes ago
        Right. It’s a little hard to parse but they’re saying “The NYT has a typo”
  • throwa356262 32 minutes ago
    Serious question: how come the police have not paid for the damage they caused?
    • wl 12 minutes ago
      They chose not to do so. And the courts are no help, because generally speaking, you can't sue the government unless there's a specific law allowing you to do so (sovereign immunity). The police as individuals are generally immune from civil suits unless they violated some clearly established right (qualified immunity).
    • Drakim 29 minutes ago
      If the damaged party tries to sue the police for the damage they caused, the police can get the case instantly dismissed underqualified immunity.
      • dec0dedab0de 14 minutes ago
        Qualified immunity just protects the police, and other government officials personally. If there is grounds for a lawsuit then he could still sue the government that employs the police department.

        I think in general, if it is a legit warrant, it is very difficult to win a lawsuit for damage. Though with that video, and how high profile this has been, he might be able to win something. though IANAL, and I'm just going off my gut.

        • voxic11 10 minutes ago
          The government has sovereign immunity which is why you usually have to sue the people involved rather than the government directly.
      • lightedman 26 minutes ago
        Stealing things out of a person's fridge and eating it is not covered under qualified immunity.
        • RIMR 16 minutes ago
          Making up details of the incident doesn't help either. They didn't eat anything, a cop just did a double-take at the lemon pound cake, and Afroman wrote a song about how they wanted to eat it.
    • caymanjim 29 minutes ago
      Qualified immunity.
      • iririririr 22 minutes ago
        which is double genius on afroman, because they forfeited qualified immunity to start this trial. now he can even sue further damages.

        distrack as legal maneuver.

      • jhancock 16 minutes ago
        I'm going to keep this one... underqualified immunity :)
  • pseudolus 2 hours ago
  • ChrisArchitect 15 minutes ago
  • josefritzishere 1 hour ago
  • josefritzishere 1 hour ago
    This is the single funniest thing to happen in at least a decade.