8 comments

  • Aerroon 19 minutes ago
    Why can a company be fined for not allowing "researchers" access to data? That seems bizarre to me.
  • briandw 19 minutes ago
    They changed the blue check from an exclusive club of the rich and popular, to just Ive got a paying account. How is that misleading? Why does the EU have a say about design choices?
  • ChrisArchitect 17 minutes ago
  • ralph84 41 minutes ago
    eurofounder and compliantvc having blue checks was probably the final straw.
  • mraduldeodhiya 18 minutes ago
    Crazy.
  • tw04 52 minutes ago
    > "Europe is taxing Americans to subsidize a continent held back by Europe’s own suffocating regulations," Carr said.

    And America is taxing Americans via tariffs to subsidize a corrupt executive branch lining its own pockets. At least Europe is looking out for a whole continent. Not just a handful of grifters.

  • Telaneo 40 minutes ago
    > "Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU," said European Commission Vice President Henna Virkkunen.

    I agree. Good EU!

    > Pre-empting the announcement on Thursday night, United States Vice President JD Vance that "the EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage."

    Sorry, but your garbage has influence outside the US. Keep it to yourself or clean up.

    Deception and fraud aren't even protected by the 1st Amendment, and the blue checkmark scheme being pay-to-win is definitely leaning that way, if not just straight up there. Seems the EU thought is just is.

    And if you care so much about free speech, maybe you should be more open about those ads of yours?